Data Protection Act 1998: Guidance for Cabinet Office Staff
Cabinet Office Policy in a Nutshell
1. Any subject access request received from an individual asking what
information is held about them by the Cabinet Office should be passed
immediately to the FOI Team. Full details are
at the end of this guidance. The FOI Team will co-ordinate the reply,
including arranging for the search, analysing the information found and
drafting the final reply. Cabinet Office staff should not attempt to reply
to an access request without consulting the Openness team.
The basics
2. The Data Protection Act 1998 (the Act) came into force in March 2000.
The Act requires that organisations which use personal data must use them
responsibly and within the law, so that individuals retain some control
over how organisations use personal data about them. Personal data is
defined in the Act in such a way as to cover virtually all information
about a living identifiable individual, referred to in the Act as a “data
subject”.
3. Under the Act, all personal data must be processed (which means doing
anything with data, including simply holding it) in accordance with the
eight data protection principles. In brief, the principles lay down that
personal data must be:
-
fairly and lawfully processed,
-
processed for specified purposes and not in any manner incompatible with
those purposes,
-
adequate, relevant and not excessive,
-
accurate,
-
kept for no longer than is necessary,
-
processed in line with the individual’s legal rights,
-
kept securely,
-
transferred to countries outside the European Economic Area, only if the
individual’s rights can be assured.
4. The Act does not only cover personal data held in files where a
particular individual is the subject of the file, such as personnel or case
files. It covers any reference to a person, no matter where it occurs,
including references held electronically. This could, for example, include
a passing reference to an individual in an email, a letter, a submission, a
list of staff, a copy list, or the minutes of a meeting. Since the
definition of personal data includes data processed electronically, it
means that CCTV footage and audio tape material are covered by the Act.
Personal data is also caught by the Act if an individual is referred to by
a reference number, code name, or any other cryptic way of identifying that
individual. Personal data held by the Cabinet Office will include
information about, for example, departmental staff (past and present),
members of the public who’ve corresponded with the Department, people in
public life, contractors, lists of contacts etc.
5. Personal data may only be processed where one of the following
conditions applies. They are, broadly, where:
-
the individual has given his consent to the processing;
-
the processing is necessary for the performance of a contract;
-
the processing is required under a legal obligation;
-
the processing is necessary to protect the vital interests of the
individual;
-
the processing is necessary to carry out government or public functions;
or
-
the processing is for the legitimate interests of the organisation
holding the data.
What it means for Cabinet Office staff
6. The implications of the Act are that wherever staff mention in writing
(whether on paper or electronically) the name of an identifiable living
individual they must ensure that:
-
They have a valid reason for recording information about the individual,
-
What is recorded about him or her is accurate (if there is doubt about
the accuracy of what is written, that should be noted),
-
Material is deleted when it is no longer needed (bearing in mind that it
might need to be retained as a public record),
-
Personal information is not disclosed to third parties without good
reason,
-
Personal data is held securely,
-
Comments are not made which staff cannot justify, or would not be happy
to see disclosed,
-
Papers are not copied more widely than necessary.
Subject access rights
7. As well as laying obligations on the data controllers, i.e. the bodies
which handle the personal data, the Act also gives rights to those who are
the subjects of the personal data. The most important right they have is
that of being told whether data about them are held, and if so, to be told
what they are; which effectively means being given a copy of the personal
data.
8. If a request is received from a data subject for details of what
information is held about them by the Cabinet Office, it should be passed
to the FOI Team, details of which
are given at the end of this guidance. The FOI Team will co-ordinate the
reply, including arranging for the search, scrutiny of any material found,
and drafting the final reply. Cabinet Office staff should not attempt to
reply to a subject access request without consulting the FOI Team.
9. There are some exemptions where personal data on an individual do not
have to be disclosed to him or her. The exemptions which are most relevant
to the Cabinet Office concern;
-
safeguarding national security;
-
prevention or detection of crime
-
apprehension or prosecution of offenders;
-
journalistic, literary or artistic purposes;
-
research, historical and statistical purposes;
-
where data is processed for the purpose of the conferring by the Crown of
any honour; and
-
where a claim to legal professional privilege could be maintained.
10. The FOI Team will advise on whether an exemption might apply in any
particular case. Note that, unlike in the Code of Practice on access to
Government Information and the Freedom of Information Act, there is no
exemption specifically for internal discussion and policy advice, so advice
given to Ministers about an individual, or which mentions an individual is
likely to be disclosable.
Other data subject rights
11. A data subject also has the right to ask a data controller to stop
processing personal data where it is causing or is likely to cause damage
or distress to themselves or anyone else. A data subject can also claim
compensation from a data controller for damage or distress caused by any
breach of the Act. He can ask the Commissioner to investigate whether any
of the principles of the Act has been contravened, and the Commissioner may
serve an enforcement notice on the data controller, requiring him to comply
with the Act. In certain circumstances, proceedings may be instituted and
courts may impose fines on the data controller.
Sensitive personal data
12. “Sensitive personal data”, as defined in the Act concern information
about:
-
racial or ethnic origin;
-
political opinions;
-
religious or similar beliefs;
-
trade union membership;
-
health;
-
sexual life;
-
criminal proceedings or convictions.
13. Sensitive data can only be processed if a specified condition applies.
The conditions include where:
-
the subject has given his explicit consent;
-
the law requires the data to be processed for employment purposes;
-
it is necessary to protect the vital interests of the data subject or
another person;
-
the data subject has himself made public the data;
-
processing is necessary for legal proceedings;
-
processing is necessary for monitoring equal opportunities.
14. If staff intend to process any such data, they should ensure that there
is a genuine business need to record it. In many cases the information will
have been made public by the data subject (e.g. the political opinions of
MPs). If in doubt, consult the FOI Team.
Notification with the Information Commissioner
15. Oversight of the Act is the responsibility of the Information
Commissioner, who is independent of government. Data controllers must
notify to the Commissioner the purposes for which they process data, and
this information is made public on the Commissioner’s website. The purposes
for which the Cabinet Office processes personal data and which it has
notified to the Commissioner are:
-
Accounts and records
-
Advertising, marketing and public relations
-
Consultancy and advisory services
-
Crime prevention and prosecution of offenders (including CCTV)
-
Education
-
Information and databank administration
-
Pensions administration (administration of pension schemes only)
-
Property management
-
Research
-
Staff Administration
16. The Information Commissioner has said that the purposes should be
interpreted broadly, and that the notification should be kept at a general
level, with only sufficient detail to give an overall picture of the
processing. If staff believe that personal data they process, or a database
they work on, might not be included in one of the categories above, they
should contact the FOI Team for advice.
Who to contact for help
17. The following should be contacted for guidance on any queries about the
Act.
Jan Kiso
020 7276 1378
He is based in:
FOI Team
Cabinet Office
Room 118
70 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2AS
Data Protection Act 1998
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. Surely I can’t be expected to obtain the permission of everybody I
mention in a letter or submission?
A. Obtaining a person’s consent is only one of the conditions under which
personal data may be processed. If it is necessary for, for example, any of
the functions of a government department, or it is necessary for the
Department’s legitimate interests, that could be sufficient justification.
Q2. If someone has only ever written one letter to the Cabinet Office, how
long should we keep it?
A. It should be retained for as long as there is a business need for it.
Depending on the circumstances, it might be reasonable to destroy it almost
immediately after receipt, or it may be necessary to retain it for some
time if it seems likely that there may be further correspondence, further
action may be required, or it should be retained as part of the corporate
record. An initial judgement must be made as to the period of retention,
but there must be a review mechanism so that the papers can be deleted when
they no longer serve a useful purpose.
Q3. We hold lists of people who we sometimes contact because they have an
interest in our subject area. How long can we keep their names and contact
details?
A. You can keep the data for as long as you think they will be useful. You
must delete them if you believe they may no longer be accurate or relevant.
You should have a mechanism for reviewing them so that they can be deleted
when appropriate.
Q4. I keep copies indefinitely of everything I create electronically. Does
the Act really expect me to go through all my documents and emails and
delete old material?
A. Even if you have grounds for retaining material at present, you must
have a review procedure for deciding what needs to be retained. The
Information Commissioner will, quite rightly, criticise any organisation
which does not have procedures in place for reviewing personal data.
Q5. I use emails as personal and ephemeral means of communication. Surely
they can’t be covered by the Act?
A. Anything committed to record in the Department is subject to the Act –
including emails. So think twice before you make any throwaway comments.
Can you justify the comment? Would you be happy to see it quoted on the
front page of a national newspaper?
Q6. The Data Protection Act says we should delete information and the
Public Record Acts say we should preserve records. Which one should I
follow?
A. If a record is likely to be required for preservation under the Public
Record Acts, there are conditions in the Data Protection Act which would
allow retention of the data. There is no conflict between the two sets of
legislation.
Q7. If I record my views about somebody, isn’t that information about me
rather than about him?
A. The definition of “personal data” in the Act includes any expression of
opinion about a person, and also any indication of intention towards the
person. So virtually any mention of a person’s name is likely to constitute
personal data about him.
Q8. If I mention a public figure in a document I write and I quote
newspaper reports about him, how can I be expected to verify whether what
is said in the newspaper is true?
A. If you write something about a person which may not be true, you could
be in breach of the Act’s requirement to be accurate. If however when you
quote information provided by a third party you make it clear that you are
merely reporting what they said, rather than expressing your own views, you
will be complying with the accuracy principle.
Q9. If I think I’ve got a valid reason for recording information about
someone but he disagrees, what happens?
A. A data subject has the right to complain to the Information Commissioner
if he believes that anyone has breached his legal rights. In the final
analysis, it will be for the Commissioner (or the courts in certain cases)
to make a judgement.
Q10. My unit processes personal data to produce anonymised statistics. Are
these covered by the Act?
A. Data only becomes personal where the individual can be identified.
Anonymised or aggregate data would not be personal as no individuals could
be identified. But care should be taken when referring to small numbers.
For instance, a statement about Permanent Secretaries in the Cabinet Office
would not be genuinely anonymous because of the small numbers involved.
Q11. We hold data on individuals but we only use reference numbers, rather
than actual names. Is this covered by the Act?
A. It would not be covered by the Act if the Department has no means of
linking the reference numbers to the individuals. But, for instance, data
about departmental staff using National Insurance numbers rather than names
would constitute personal data if the Department held personnel records
which would permit NINOs to be linked with names of individual staff, even
if the two sets of records were held in different parts of the Department.
Q12. My unit uses an outside contractor to carry out certain functions,
which requires us to pass personal data to the contractor. Is this allowed?
A. This is permissible under the Act, but the contractor must sign a
contract agreeing to act only on instructions from the Department, and to
provide appropriate security measures. A specimen contract is available
from the FOI Team.
Q13. If someone wants to know what paper records we hold on him, how can we
be expected to search through all our files for any passing reference to
him?
A. At present, we are only required to search for paper records which held
on highly structured files, such as files containing papers on a named
individual, and where there is a high degree of internal organisation of
the file. From January 2005, all paper records held by government
departments will be caught by the Act, including unstructured files and
where there is only a passing reference to an individual. There will
however be a provision which exempts us for searching for material where
the cost of doing so would exceed a certain limit. Guidance will be issued
when sections are asked to carry out searches.
Q14. If someone asks for the information we hold on him and some of it will
be embarrassing to Ministers, can we withhold it?
A. There is no exemption for such a situation. Unless another exemption
applies, the personal data must be disclosed. The embarrassment in such
material often lies in the way in which it is expressed, rather than the
actual content. The test when writing anything is to ask yourself whether
you would be happy to see those personal comments quoted on the front page
of a newspaper.
Q15. If someone asks for the information we hold on him, what’s to stop me
deleting it to stop him being given it?
A. Information relating to an individual can be deleted after receipt of a
subject access request from him only if it would have been deleted at that
point in accordance with existing records management policies and
procedures. From January 2005, anyone who destroys information with the
intention of preventing its disclosure in response to a request will be
personally guilty of an offence and, on conviction, may be fined.
Q16. How often can someone make a request for the information we hold on
him?
A. We are not required to respond unless a “reasonable interval” has
elapsed since his last request. What is reasonable will depend on the
circumstances. For instance, if there has been a lot of correspondence
since the last request, it will be more reasonable to respond than if it
has only been a short time and little data has been created about him.
Q17. What happens if a person makes a request for the information we hold
on him and says he wants everyone in the Department to search their
records?
A. The Act requires individuals making subject access request to provide
enough information to enable the personal data on him to be identified. If
an individual cannot provide us with that information, such as giving us
details about who in the Department he has been corresponding with, we can
decline to carry out a search. Only if he has provided us with enough
information to enable us to narrow down the search will we begin a trawl
for the data in the areas of the Department most likely to hold them.
Q18. What do I do if I want to transfer personal data outside the European
Economic Area, such as to the USA?
A. Before you do anything, consult the FOI Team.
Q19. If personal data is exempt from disclosure, do we have to search for
it in response to a subject access request?
A. Whether an exemption applies will be a matter of judgement in each case
and it may not be possible to decide until the material in question has
been examined, possibly by lawyers. Individual units should not make
decisions on the applicability of exemptions without consulting the FOI
Team.
Q20. If a reference is made to someone only by reference to his position or
title, e.g. the Prime Minister, or the Minister for the Cabinet Office, is
he covered by the Act?
A. If it is obvious who the individual is, or his identity could be
discovered through research, then he is covered by the Act, and any
information we hold on him, even if it does not refer to him by name, must
comply with the Act and would be disclosable if he were to make a subject
access request.
Q21. Does the Act only apply to British subjects?
A. Anyone can make a subject access request under the Act, regardless of
their nationality and regardless of where they are in the world.